Which medium do you feel has better served Science fiction as a genre?
There are certain classics on film like 2001 which would not work on the small screen or serial format.
However the more action oriented ones that have multiple sequels get very repetitive very fast and loose what ever was that created the suspence and itnerst. Television can play around with that kind of format more, which Is why I think Terminator: The Sarah Chronicles was better than any of the big screen sequels.
Any thoughts? As AMc is providing this forum are there any classic Sci-Fi series that you wish they would re-air?
portiaslegacy
June 18, 2009 10:13am
Filed under: SciFi Culture
I think it's safe to say, that Superhero movies have really shaped the action-adventure genre. With break throughs like: The Dark Knight, Iron Man, and others. Looks like there is light at the end of the tunnel for this genre. Or is there?
the much anticapated Watchmen hit theaters last week, and it has been described in a very good manner. But it's box office performance is anything, but impressive. It hasn't been the breakthrough people thought it would it be. Which raises an intresting question: Are superheros not so super anymore? There have been plenty of flopes. Fantastic Four, The Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Superman Returns, X2, X-Men: Last Stand, and all the Blade films.
It is a common fact that when a genre is done to death, the taste of the audience goes elsewhere. Which could put Superheros in hot water. And not just on the big screen( I can't stand Heroes anymore).
Only time will tell.
Donovan Austin
March 12, 2009 12:13pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: superheroes
Just in case you haven't seen this. Some of these are GREAT:
http://teenormous.com/lists/funniest-unofficial-star-wars-t-shirts-4
Brian
Brian
February 12, 2009 12:10am
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: star wars, t-shirts
Sequels and remakes appear to be the only thing anybody is making nowadays. But which would you perfer to see?
I'm am not arguring for or against either one I'm just laying out some pros and cons.
The pro about a remake is that you get to take something nostalgic and make fun for a new generation. It can also be intresting what you do with characters
Good Remakes:
1. King Kong (2005)
It's an exciting amped up version of the dull and slow paced 1933 film. It has all the favorite scenes (V-Rex fight, Empire State Building fight), but in COLOR!
Continue »
Donovan Austin
December 30, 2008 10:00pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: remakes, sequels
Since we're plugging web comics, please check out Marooned - A Space Opera in the Wrong Key. Sci-Fi Humor and Adventure every Monday and Thursday.
http://www.maroonedcomic.com
Marooned
September 12, 2008 1:56pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: marooned
Who is your favorite? Do you like the baddie Klingons, or are the heartwarming antics of ET more your speed?
McGillicuddy
September 2, 2008 2:12pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Kevin Maher's SciFi Department video last week about the cars of tomorrow got me thinking: if I could have any vehicle from any Science Fiction realm, what would it be?
The Trekkie in me instantly turns to the Enterprise-D of The Next Generation, but then I think of issues of practicality: I mean, where on earth would I park it? The flying and time-traveling DeLorean is tempting, though judging from the trilogy the thing pretty much breaks down every time you use it. I think I would have to pick the Millennium Falcon, which is an awesome looking ship, it's armed to the teeth and it somehow has the ability to turn space into time -- I assume making the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs has something to do with the warping effect of hyperspace? Then again, maybe George Lucas just didn't do his homework. Either way, I think it's the all around best choice in terms of aesthetics, versatility, speed, and of course armaments.
What SciFi ride would you guys most like to cruise in?
Clayton Neuman
April 8, 2008 11:49am
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: vehicles
Here's a memorable quote from a Science Fiction film. The first commenter to guess the correct film posts the next quote.
"As a matter of cosmic history, it has always been easier to destroy, than to create."
Who said it, and in what film? Let the games begin!
Clayton Neuman
March 24, 2008 4:02pm
Filed under: Favorite SciFi Films, SciFi Culture
Tags: quotes
Comic book artist Warren Ellis recently started a limited series for Marvel called Ultimate Human, which to make a long psychedelic (it is, after all, Warren Ellis) is essentially an Incredible Hulk vs. Iron Man story. I couldn't help but be struck with the coincidence that while we read Ellis' story we're all eagerly anticipating a Hulk and an Iron Man movie this year. There have even been hints that the two films will nod to each other in anticipation of an eventual Avengers movie.
My question is this: if you could make a movie that pits any two superheroes against each other regardless of price, publishing house, or comic canon, who would it be?
Aside from pitting Marvel heroes against their DC counterparts (Aquaman vs. The Sub-Mariner for control of Atlantis, anyone?), I have to say that I think the most interesting match-up would be Batman vs. Wolverine. Think about it, here are two guys that are literally barely hanging on to their humanity and composure (at least in the Frank Miller version of Batman). The Dark Knight might be at a slight disadvantage here, but if he could come up with some nifty toys to even the balance, I think we would have a no-holds-barred showdown between two extremely grizzled superheroes. What do you guys think?
Clayton Neuman
March 20, 2008 4:51pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: superheroes
I read an interesting piece today on Our Future: Thoughts about why Science Fiction writers are no longer making outlandish predictions about the future in their fiction. Citing a paper by futurist Ray Kurzweil, the blog writes, "Fiction writers are no longer able to think beyond the predicted 'technological singularity' that many believe will occur in or around 2030. That is to say that the human mind can no longer comprehend how life could be beyond the next thirty years when taking into account the advancements we have made in the past few decades." Basically, the author argues that we have made such exponential advances in mere decades that to ponder beyond is simply out of our range of comprehension.
I have to say that I disagree. I don't believe the reason we no longer try to predict the future is because we can't fathom it. I think we no longer do it because we fear embarrassing ourselves when the future turns out to be mundane. Predicitons of the future just 60 or 70 years ago had us in flying cars and living on the moon by the year 2000 (Take a look at David Szondy's Tales of Future Past and you'll see what I'm talking about).
Obviously, that didn't come to pass. So I feel like we've curbed our expectations about what science can do for us in the future simply because we don't want to look foolish. Essentially, why predict that by the year 2030 we'll have flying cars if you'll be around to see yourself proven wrong?
What do you think? Have Science Fiction writers given up on prediction in favor of fantasy? What could be the reason for that?
Clayton Neuman
February 26, 2008 1:07pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Technology breeds temptation, at least when it comes to Science Fiction films, where for the past decade or so the urge to recreate some of the genre's Golden Age has been growing apace with the CGI industry. There have been hits (Steven Spielberg's War of the Worlds) and misses (The Invasion with Nicole Kidman).
So what makes a remake work? With so many remakes preparing to bear down upon audiences--Star Trek, The Day the Earth Stood Still--and even more being discussed--Dune, Logan's Run, Tron--the question becomes, not why do it but how? What loyalties do you owe the original? What SciFi films beg improvement?
Let us know your thoughts on SciFi remakes, and enter for a chance to win the original The Day the Earth Stood Still on DVD.
Update: A winner has been randomly selected. Check after the jump to see the winner and the comment.
Continue »
Clayton Neuman
January 31, 2008 5:55pm
Filed under: Questions, SciFi Culture
Tags: day the earth stood still, remakes, science fiction
Doug Liman's upcoming film Jumper is about an ordinary teenager who discovers he has the power to teleport anywhere he wants. With great power comes great responsibility, right? Not so much. Christensen's character decides to rob a bank.
There's something so refreshing about that kind of brutal honesty, isn't there? I mean, "boys will be boys." Tell the truth: If all of a sudden you discovered that you could turn invisible, would you sneak into a few locker rooms before saving the world? Personally, if I could read peoples' minds, I might employ it to negotiate my next car purchase as soon as I'd use it to stop an evil plot. And if I could teleport inside a vault, I would be hard-pressed not to consider reappropriating some discretionary funds.
If you could have a superpower, what would it be? Would you use it for good, like our friendly neighborhood Spider-man, or just go have a blast? Any other fans of flying?
Clayton Neuman
January 31, 2008 12:47pm
Filed under: SciFi Culture
Tags: superpowers
Iron Man, Hulk, Thor, Justice League, Green Arrow--it seems every time I turn around either Warner Brothers or Marvel has announced their next big comic book adaptation. And it's not just the superheroes: A History of Violence, 300, Watchmen, and Ronin are all taken from the pages of our favorite imprints. Hollywood has caught graphic novel fever, and its not showing any signs of subsiding.
Is this a good thing, or have we gone superhero crazy? Why is Hollywood so interested now? Has the mainstream finally "discovered" comics, or is it just plain out of fresh ideas? When is enough enough? What movies should never be attempted, and what comics have been neglected? Tell us what you're thinking.
Clayton Neuman
January 30, 2008 11:18am
Filed under: Questions, SciFi Culture
Tags: adaptations, comics