Star Trek Vs. Star Wars
Since I was a little kid, I've always been more of a Star Trek guy. I had practically memorized every episode of The Next Generation, owned all the action figures and playsets, and even had a Halloween costume or two. But no matter how hard I tried, I could never convince my friend Jon that Star Trek was any good. For him it was Star Wars or bust. He must have seen each of the movies over a hundred times, and when the original three were re-released he made sure we were all first in line at the theater.
I would say forcefields, he would say the Force. I would say phasers, he would say sabers. I would say warp speed, he would say hyperspace. I couldn't figure out why until I realized that for almost every aspect of Star Trek there exists a counterpoint in Star Wars, and vice versa.
I tell this story because the teaser for J.J. Abrams' new Star Trek has come out just as George Lucas has been tantalizing fans with images from his new CGI Clone Wars. Rumors of a pending live action television series could send the competition into another dimension! Are we heading into a SciFi showdown between the two franchises?
Could Star Wars ever trump Star Trek on the small screen? Could Captain Kirk beat Han Solo in a battle of brain and braun? Is the Prime Directive a better motivating force than, well, the Force? Is there really a difference between the two? Or are these just two parallel universes?
- (2)
- Email this entry



















