SciFi Scanner

Science Fiction Movies, News and Discussion

John Scalzi - What the Recession Means for SciFi Movies... Less Trek?

Trek_Recession_560x330.jpgjohn_scalzi_callout_r2.jpg

Another reader question! I do so love reader questions, since they keep me from having to think up a column topic on my own. This one asks:

"How do you think the economic recession will affect movies in general, and science fiction and fantasy movies in particular?"

This is a two-part question. The first question is, how will the recession affect the way people go to the movies? The second is, how will the recession affect the way Hollywood makes movies?

To answer the first question: Very little. The box office for 2009 so far has been good -- a bit over where it was this time last year -- and science fiction and fantasy flicks have been a significant part of that. Watchmen has the top opening of 2009 so far with $55 million (although that's likely to be blown away this weekend by Monsters Vs. Aliens), and other sf/f movies have been strong at the box office: Nicolas Cage's thriller Knowing was the surprise #1 picture last weekend, and the fantasy Coraline has had tremendous legs, in part thanks to its 3D. This is not to say the genre hasn't already had its flops in 2009 -- Inkheart, anyone? -- but overall it's accounted for a significant portion of the box office and will continue to do so well through the summer, when Star Trek and Harry Potter and the Terminator show up to take your money.

The resiliency of the movie box office during a recession isn't that much of a surprise. It's a traditional Hollywood shibboleth that recessions are good for movies, since movies are a relatively cheap entertainment option and people are motivated to escape their worries for a couple hours of laughter and/or special effects. Indeed when your top movie so far is Paul Blart: Mall Cop, you can't say this is the year for thoughtful, serious pictures. It's pretty clear people are going to the movies to forget about the real world -- a positive for science fiction.

The second half of the question is a little more difficult to answer, in part because Hollywood plans and finances its movies well in advance of their release dates, so any effect the economy has on the film industry won't show up on the actual movie screen until months or even years later. The flicks you'll see in the theaters today were greenlit two or more years ago, back before AIG and and the Dow losing 50% of its value. The true movies of the recession won't show up until next year at the earliest.

But that's not to say changes aren't coming: This New York Times article about how movie stars and dealmakers are "toughening up" gives an indication of the belt-tightening that's going on in Hollywood. A lot of stars, directors and producers who used to have production deals will find themselves without, and a lot of talent, both above and below the line, is going to have to accept getting paid less or working less. Speaking strictly from a "bottom-line" point of view, this is not a horrible thing for studios because a significant portion of these production deals are not especially productive. Speaking from the point of view of the key grip who won't be working for six or nine months out of 2009, though, it sucks pretty hard.

What moviegoers might notice is that the major studios may release fewer movies, opening the market up to smaller players. We're seeing that already: Knowing, for example, was released not by a major studio but by Summit Entertainment, a newer production house which recently scored big with Twilight, and also had the moderately successful flick Push. Smaller production companies put together pictures on tighter budgets (the production budgets for Twilight, Push and Knowing combined were $130 million, which happens to be the budget for Watchmen, from Warner Bros.), which can be an advantage in a market like this.

Overall I expect science fiction and fantasy will ride out the recession pretty well. They're escapist fun, they're a proven draw at the box office and they scale so that both major studios and smaller players can make decent flicks. Economically these are not the best of times, but fans of the genre can take comfort that for scifi, it won't be the worst of times either.

Winner of the Hugo Award and the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer, John Scalzi is the author of The Rough Guide to Sci-Fi Movies and the novels Old Man's War and Zoe's Tale. He's also Creative Consultant for the upcoming Stargate: Universe television series. His column appears every Thursday.

  • Comments (8)
  • (3)
  • Link
  • Add This!

Filed under: John Scalzi
Tags: harry potter, knowing, star trek, terminator, watchmen

Comments

user-pic

I for one think the reason some of these films flop is because some studios don't do enough marketing for them. Fox being the worst of all, especially with Walden Media properties. And when I heard they were going to take over "Narnia", it made me automatically think the same would happen. But people would get fired, which makes me happy as they need to stop jacking around with these movies.

default userpic

John, do you think it possible that the current economy might usher in somw smaller, less effects driven SF movies? Or is that just a pipe dream.

default userpic

John, do you think it possible that the current economy might usher in some smaller, less effects driven SF movies? Or is that just a pipe dream.

default userpic

Of course, the downside of this is that someone at Universal is already trying to figure out how to make a Big Budget screen version of Battlestar Galactica now that the series has ended.

Because that will rock just like the My Favorite Martian movie and Lost In Space.

Yes, sci fi usually saves the box office, and usually offers some great flicks. But for every Harry Potter, there's going to be a Lost In Space that never should have made it out of reruns.

default userpic

@Jim Winter: They did it before (BG), why wouldn't they do it again? Except this time the movie would be original and not just some of the episodes spliced together.

But it does bring back one of my fondest memories of going to the movies as a kid -- my mother was asleep up until the Cylon bases exploded in Sensoround. She just about jumped out of her skin...

default userpic

I expect science fiction and fantasy will ride out the recession pretty well. They're escapist fun

So "serious" sci-fi movies may not get made by the majors? Just more things like Transformers sequels?

default userpic

I hope you are right. And lets hope there is more than just colourful eye-candy & sequels - some "plot" - i.e. serious sci-fi movies would be nice.

And slightly off topic (and ignoring the thought that it is difficult to tell which way is "up" in space) - isn't that Starship pictire shown at the head of your column shown upside down?

default userpic

Nice to hear that the movie industry doesn’t suffer much from recession. Basically, almost all sectors had been hit, so they were tend to leverage the effect through making loans to sustain the normal cycle of the business. Some businesses acquire short-term loan as a form of debt relief. Short-term loans have gained popularity since the credit market has dried up and all the funding along with it. Companies that offer short term loans have stayed a little more liquid than normal lenders, such as the average credit card company. In today's economy, there is a severe recession and financial shortfall – even the credit card companies are less willing to lend you money at ridiculous rates. The Federal Reserve has pumped billions into finance companies to reverse the trend, but it hasn't worked as well as intended, so naturally people turn to short term loans for debt relief.

Leave a comment