Gadgets? Space Stations? How James Bond Flirts With Science Fiction

It's no secret that science fiction fans are particularly strict when it comes to their beloved genre -- especially about deciding what should be included as part of that genre. Endless debates ensue as to whether this book or that movie is science fiction or just some other genre dressed up in science fictional clothing. Outland with Sean Connery is, after all is said and done, just High Noon in space. A good rule of thumb that I like to use - and I'm as fanboyish as they come -- is that the scientific elements of the story need to be integral to the plot to be considered scifi. So sorry, Sean... but fear not! You might still be considered a science fiction hero -- and no, I'm not talking about Highlander, Meteor or -- God forbid -- Zardoz. I'm talking about Bond... James Bond. (You had to see that coming.)
By any reasonable measure, the James Bond films are not science fiction. They are spy movies based on the spy novels Ian Fleming started writing in 1953. It's spyfi, not scifi. The Bond films are about secret missions to save the world, jet-setting to exotic locales, double agents and counter-intelligence, good guy vs. bad guy, car chases and fist fights, and, of course, romancing glamorous, suggestively-named women. They are not about asking the science fictional question of, "What if?"
However! While not overtly scifi, the Bond films have occasionally dipped their swizzle stick into the shaken-not-stirred martini of scifi. It's not as if Bond traded in his Aston Martin for a land speeder, but you could say that over the past 45 years, James Bond has been flirting with scifi.
Here's how:
All Those Cool Gadgets
The most obvious nod to science fiction in the Bond series -- the
gadgets -- is why many people consider the films to be scifi.
Beginning with From Russia with Love, Bond's pre-mission technical briefing with "Q" is where the films get to play in the scifi sandbox. More recent technological advances make Bond's
"futuristic" gadgets seem like no big deal, but
the typewriter-sized Lektor Decoder of From Russia with Love or the homing beacons of Goldfinger were considered cutting edge... back in the sixties.
But consider Thunderball's use of the jet pack, the Gyrojet rocket guns and the X-Ray Desk. Or, consider the radioactive lint used for weapons targeting in On Her Majesty's Secret Service. In Diamonds Are Forever, there's an electromagnetic RPM controller ring that guarantees a slot machine win. Live and Let Die showed us a watch that doubles as a buzz saw. In The Spy Who Loved Me, Bond's car, the Lotus Esprit S1, sports missiles, landmines and torpedoes. Despite oddities like the explosive toothpaste in License to Kill, these are cool, futuristic gadgets that show James Bond toying with the tech you might find in a science fiction movie.
Blofeld's Grand Scheme in Diamonds Are Forever
Diamonds Are Forever may start as your average Bond film, with
Bond posing as a diamond smuggler to uncover an economically troubling
price-fixing scam, but it eventually turns towards much more science
fictional pursuits. The smuggled diamonds, it turns out, are being used
by Bond's longtime enemy, Ernst Stavro Blofeld for his nefarious
schemes. Blofeld's plan?
Nothing less than nuclear supremacy on a worldwide scale.
It may be interesting to note that space satellites and the threat of nuclear destruction were not part of the 1956 Ian Fleming novel on which this film is based. Could it be that in 1971 the movie makers were looking to update the novel in light of the recent moon landing of 1969? Whatever the reason, Diamonds are Forever was one of Bond's earliest flirtations with scifi, even if it was tacked on.
Rebooting the New Human Race in Moonraker
If the ultimate plan of Blofeld in Diamonds Are Forever is only a flirtation with scifi, then the world-domination plot of Hugo Drax in Moonraker
is like a full-blown make-out session in Bond's Aston Martin. (Too bad
there's no back seat.) This was another adaptation of one of Fleming's
novels, and another chance for Hollywood to add scifi elements where
there were none before.
Drax's plan is the stuff of science fiction: To reboot the human race. He selects a group of genetically perfect Adams and Eves and squirrels them away to his space station, while he destroys the rest of Earth's population with gaseous poison.
Space stations? Genocide? World re-colonization? These are the tropes of science fiction. Add to that the space shuttles and laser battle between Drax's henchmen and the Marines, and you have a film that even Star Wars fans might pay money to see. At least, that was the hope of the producers when they saw the huge success of Star Wars in 1977 and bumped up the production of Moonraker to 1979. (For Your Eyes Only was originally slated to be the next Bond film after The Spy Who Loved Me.)
So you see, James Bond is no stranger to science fiction. He's more like a well-dressed second-cousin to scifi... who would garrote you with his wristwatch in a heartbeat. He is a spy, after all.










Hollywood's Bond has always been on the bleeding edge of reality. We all know that spies get the best toys, but since they're understandably secret, the writers have consistently engaged in speculative fiction, if only casting their gaze forward a year or two.
... although, now that I think about it... the Bond villains have always had much more science fiction flair than 007 himself. Maybe these films somehow represent the struggle between science fiction fandom and the mundane world?
No, I didn't think so either. :)
Agreed on the villains, Jeff. Some of them have evil lairs that make the Batcave look like a Little Tykes play set. (Adam West's Batcave, at least.)
As a kid I used to get really bored during all the James Bond movies that DIDN'T have sci-fi stuff going on in them. Though even at that tender age, Moonraker seemed to jump the shark.
Agreed on Moonraker. By then, the evil metal-mouth giant Jaws was a caricature of every other Bond villain. And Bond himself was out of his element in space.
I found the idea of the invisible car in Die Another Day to be too scifi and really cheesy in the context of a James Bond film. Of course, this week scientists announced they've made a material and process that can - wait for it - make things invisible. Maybe that movie was just ahead of the curve.
There's no denying the coolness of an invisible car. The trick is to keep it withing the confines of the realism set by the rest of the film. If it takes you out of the story, then it's more flash than substance.