Will Iron Man's Marketing Campaign Cause a Snakes on a Plane Backlash?
This Friday, Iron Man hits theaters. Chances are you've seen at least a poster and a commercial for the flick. There's also a good chance that you've probably seen multiple trailers, read stories about the movie online, and perhaps, viewed some promotional scenes.
Maybe you've even go so far as to watch all the promotional scenes, look at the hundreds of stills available online, buy the game, buy the novelization, and build yourself a suit of home-made Iron Man armor.
The question though, is, at what point is there too much marketing for a film? There's a lot of attention being paid to Iron Man's box office results this weekend, and for good reason.
1) It's "going up against" Grand Theft Auto IV, which will probably make more money this week than any entertainment product in the history of time itself. The question is, if you're spending $60 on a game, will you want to spend another $10 on a movie?
2) It's a second-tier superhero, meaning not many people know Iron Man they same way they know Batman, Superman, Spider-Man, or even the Hulk or X-Men. Can you effectively market a superhero no-one has heard of, and even most comic book fans don't like?
3) We've now seen a cycle where X-Men was an unknown quantity; people were shocked that Spider-Man did so well on its first round; we got several more quality superhero flicks; and then we got the mega-grossing but universally reviled X-Men 3 and Spider-Man 3. Will Iron Man sound the death toll of the superhero film genre, or its second renaissance?
For all these reasons, and more (Robert Downey Jr.'s star power, Jon Favreau's career, Gwyneth Paltrow's sexy red hair), there's a lot of attention being paid to this film. And, for that reason, Paramount is taking the tact of marketing the film as if it was a brand new character. Which, for many people, comic book fans included, it is. However, this has taken the form of a marketing glut.
So when does it take a turn from "Oh cool, a new trailer," to "Oh my god, shut up about Iron Man already" to a Snakes on a Plane-style bomb?
With Iron Man, Paramount knows they are standing in front of a good product, and so their marketing efforts read as, "We're proud of this, we have nothing to hide, we would happily show you the film right now if we could." This sort of confidence seeps into the viewing populace. And, it certainly doesn't hurt that numerous publications are writing articles like this one, talking about Iron Man's marketing campaign. (That's part of the marketing campaign too, isn't it?)
And on the off chance that, the week before, viewers are feeling Iron Fatigue, advanced screenings have started to create positive buzz, with reviewers stating that the movie lives up to the hype. That, in essence, backs up everything a viewer has learned over the past few months: the movie looks good, and I was correct, so now I'll go see it.
Whether Iron Man is actually good, or not, only your own viewing will tell. As for me, I'll be there opening night, because the trailers, and the pictures, and the scenes, and the novel, and the game all look amazing.










While I am (and have been for 2 years) anticipating a very good movie, I agree that a saturation point has been reached. I mean, c'mon, a CMT 'Trick My Truck" episode where Marvel/Universal do an Iron Man makeover of some guy's semi?
So what's the solution? Just don't watch it.
Don't watch any of the 'sneak preview' scenes or watch the behind the scenes stuff with Favreau and RDJr on FX in between some of Marvel's more tepid (FF) and wretched (DD) superhero movies. Just let the anticipation build on its own and then go early, grab a good seat at a digital screen and sit back for what is going to be the start of one of the best 'superhero' movie summers ever.
Man, I hate to go to bat for Marvel, but I just have to. It's your 2nd point that gets me, and I'm not even an Iron Man fan.
Basic fact: Although Superman, Batman, and Spider-man are definitely three of the most recognizable superheroes, the question as to whether or not Iron Man is as popular as the X-Men or the Hulk is debatable. Very debatable.
Oh, and let's not forget, Iron Man was a central figure in Marvel's recent Civil War storyline.
So, yeah, a superhero that no one likes and that no one has ever heard of? I'd call that pretty far off base. Please leave that at home the next time you write an article.
I'd say more, but the rest of your article falls has problems of a similar type, and a confused tone to boot.
Actually, if we're talking comic book fans, sure. No problem. Most of them probably know who Iron Man is, and even remember the title "Demon in a Bottle" offhand, could tell you his arch-nemesis is the Mandarin, and tons of other facts.
However, for the general populace, Iron Man is NOT a house-hold name. The Hulk enjoyed a relatively popular TV series, so certainly people are aware of the Hulk. As for X-Men, not as much as a whole, which was why there was concern when the movie was coming out that it would bomb, but Wolverine is Marvel's 2nd most popular character (after Spider-Man).
As for Iron Man, I'm not going to drop any names, but literally five minutes ago I was talking to a Marvel worker who told me there was some polling of potential audience members for Iron Man, and the majority of people asked said, "I don't know, is he some sort of robot?" So... Take from that what you will.