History is (re)written by the victors
When Kurt Vonnegut wrote Slaughterhouse-Five in 1969, it was as much an act of reportage as of imagination. The book, the basis for the 1972 film by George Roy Hill, was the first time many readers of its generation ever heard of the Allied campaign during the Second World War of bombing German cities.
As an American soldier Vonnegut was held prisoner in a German POW facility in the city of Dresden. He was one of the few to survive the firebombing of that city on February 13, 1945, in which 135,000 German civilians were killed. That’s more dead in one day than were killed by both of the atom bombs dropped on Japan a few months later.
Vonnegut died a few months ago, but I wonder what he would have thought about the recent decision of the Canadian War Museum to reword a display concerning the six-year bombing campaign. The Museum is responding to 18 months of complaints from veterans’ organizations who feel that the following statement paints them as war criminals:
"The value and morality of the strategic bomber offensive against Germany remains bitterly contested. Bomber Command's aim was to crush civilian morale and force Germany to surrender by destroying its cities and industrial installations. Although Bomber Command and American attacks left 600,000 Germans dead and more than five million homeless, the raids resulted in only small reductions in German war production until late in the war."
It seems to me that these lines, backed by a respected panel of historians, say only that there is a controversy, which is undeniable. No one disputes the facts, unpleasant as they may be. But whitewashing history does no one any good, least of all those who deaths deserve to be honored with the truth.




















I respect the sentiment of the post. Hence my own comment - attempting to find the facts are important. The figure you give, 135,000 is incorrect, most likely inflated by Nazi propeganda at the time, and has been used since WWII to paint the Allies as somehow being as morally reprehensible as the Nazis (I think some of the men and women who fought the Nazis have a problem with this misuse of the historical record).
As a vocal opponent of war, Vonnegut often refers to the 135,000 figure. He experienced the bombing - but he wasn't involved in the academic work (see the reference to the German research) undertaken to attempt to resolve the issue of casualty figures.
There's a helpful wiki page on the bombing of Dresden that helps to explain the casualty figures and the controversy behind them http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden
I'd recommend the work of historian Richard J Evans who has done alot of research debunking the inflated casualty figures.
30,000 dead is a horrible loss of life - why cheapen this loss, by creating all this controversy (possibly for political reasons - as has been done in the past) to inflate an already enormous number?
Greg - Thanks for the correction. I was indeed using Vonnegut's number. Even at the smaller number, it's almost impossible to conceive of so many people killed in one day.