Monsterfest

Horror Movies, News, Discussion

How True Are Horror Movies Based on Real-Life Events?

strangers-560.jpg

Blogger Stacie Ponder's horror columns appear every Wednesday.

There's been much ado over the fact that The Strangers, which opened last week, is purportedly "inspired by true events." What true events? Did a trio of weirdos in super-creepy masks really decide to terrorize a good-looking young couple one night simply because they were home? Well, yes... but mostly, no. Read a few interviews with writer/director Bryan Bertino and you'll discover that once, when he was young, someone knocked on his door... and there were a bunch of robberies in his neighborhood... and, uh, he read Helter Skelter.  So, you see, in a way the film is inspired by true events -- but as to the actual plot? Nah. Never happened.

Does it matter whether or not it's a true story? To me, it makes little to no difference in terms of my enjoyment of the film. The Strangers (or any other horror film) isn't any more or less scary if the plot is "ripped from the headlines." I can see how folks might get antsy knowing that there really are mask-n-knife wielding cuckoo nutsos out there, but, slap my face and call me Fox Mulder: I'll believe just about anything. As a kid, I imagined a backyard full of zombies often enough that Night of the Living Dead could very well have been based on a true story as far as I was concerned, whether Romero said it was or not.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Of course, the "true story" angle, when used, is generally anything but -- stories are distorted beyond recognition or the disclaimer is simply a big fat lie. Did I enjoy Fargo any less when I discovered that the Coen Brothers lied to me and Marge Gunderson doesn't really exist? Not a bit. How about the famous opening voiceover of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, wherein John Larroquette informs the audience that the events they're about to see really did take place on a particularly unfortunate summer day in Texas? The film is very loosely based on the crimes of Ed Gein, the infamous grave-robber and human-furniture maker, but the wacky Leatherface family is strictly a figment of Tobe Hooper's and Kim Henkel's imaginations. Not so long ago I took a vacation in the desert and lemme tell ya, I drove by enough desolate gas stations and abandoned-looking properties with crazy crap all over the yard to bring TCM to mind and make me put the pedal ever-so-slightly more to the metal. Just because it didn't happen doesn't mean it couldn't happen, you know?

Silent Hill
Sometimes real-life events can act as a springboard for a film and be re-appropriated for a different story altogether. Such is the case with Silent Hill, one of the better video game adaptations to come down the pike. In the game, there are three "worlds," like layers or dimensions, in the town of Silent Hill: The normal, quaint resort town, the world of darkness, and the world that is constantly enveloped in a thick fog. In the 2006 movie, writer Roger Avary and director Christophe Gans attempted to make the explanations a little less convoluted, so the "thick fog," at least, has its roots in reality. Rather than fog, the cinematic Silent Hill is covered in ash that constantly falls from the sky, the result of an underground mine fire. Gans and Avary found inspiration for this idea in the story of Centralia, a town in eastern Pennsylvania that has been virtually abandoned due to the mine fire that has been burning underground there since 1962. Pictures of Centralia are creepy: The roads are buckled, there are large fissures in the earth and smoke rises from cemeteries. If Silent Hill existed in our world, it would most likely be there, and I'm tempted to go check it out -- I live on the edge!

The Amityville Horror
Then there's the "No really, we swear, this is a totally true story!" movie, a la The Amityville Horror.  There's no denying that some bad juju went down at 112 Ocean Avenue: Ronald DeFeo did, in fact, kill six of his family members in the house. It's what came after those horrible murders that has made the Amityville house so famous, though: To put it succinctly, lots of crazy supernatural crap went down -- or at least it did according to George and Kathy Lutz, who moved in a year after the DeFeo murders. According to the Lutzes, everything experienced by their on-screen counterparts (James Brolin and Margot Kidder) actually happened to them: The flies swarmed, the giant purple pig appeared, there were cold spots, stinky spots, oozy spots, and a hidden "red room" in the basement. In a positively shocking turn of events, none of this has ever been reliably corroborated by anyone; in fact, most of it can be explained away -- the "red room", for example, was just a l'il closet of which previous owners were well aware. No one who's lived at 112 Ocean Avenue since the Lutzes split has reported any supernatural shenanigans. So is The Amityville Horror a true story or not?

We'll never really know. But again, does it matter? Would Stuart Rosenberg's enjoyable shlockfest suddenly become something more frightening and meaningful if it was proven, once and for all, that the house really did tell people to "Get out"? I seriously doubt it. All I know is, I'm gonna choose to believe that it all happened, that Amityville is a true story. You can call me crazy, but life is much more fun if you're open to these things... and I want to live in a world where evil, super-sized, purple, demonic pigs with glowing red eyes actually exist.


sp.jpgA fan of horror movies and scary stuff, Stacie Ponder started her blog Final Girl so she'd have a platform from which she could tell everyone that, say, Friday the 13th, Part 2 rules. She leads a glamorous life, walking on the razor's edge of danger and intrigue.



  • Comments (8)
  • (3)
  • Email this entry
  • Link
  • Add This!

Filed under: Stacie Ponder
Tags: amityville horror, silent hill, texas chainsaw massacre, the strangers

Comments

user-pic

I'm in the "doesn't matter" camp. For me most movies are about suspending disbelief anyway so I having the "no really it happened I swear" all over the promotional stuff doesn't do much for me either way.

I'd never heard of Centralia but that does sound pretty creepy. I'd be careful checking it out though, you don't want to run into any ash covered zombies....or do you?

user-pic

I still think the blair witch project is the reigning champ of actuality trickery, though. Movies shouldnt be promoted as true, but so many movies are, it would be a never ending battle. Movies like TTCM, I have less of a problem with, but when movies like The Strangers promote a flat out lie, it starts to cross the line. When they open the movie with "What you are about to see is inspired by true events", thats pretty infuriating. Its like saying that a movie that I made about a bank robbery was inspired by the true event of me walking into a bank one time. But, hey, they've got $20 million and I dont, so maybe I should start using that marketing ploy for all of my future films. ;)

user-pic

I think the "based on true events" thing is just another way to break down audience suspension of disbelief, the opposite approach of "It's only a movie, it's only a movie..." Them, the French horror thriller about a home invasion, also claims to be based on true events. What it is really based on is research that the filmmakers did on the subject. The movie as a whole was inspired by asking people they knew about what they most feared, which turned out to be someone breaking into their houses. So what's basically "true" about Them is that home invasions occur, and that people fear them. Norman Mailer once remarked that he didn't see a difference between what historians do and what novelists do, and that furthermore, novelists could more closely approach the truth of an event because they weren't bound by giving an audience just the "facts" of the event. They could explore and speculate about emotional and intellectual reactions to that event. Lastly, the implication of the "based on true events" disclaimer in horror films is that it could happen to you, too, which makes it all the more scary.

default userpic

Personally, I'd rather not know that these slasher tales are based on true stories. The idea that we're supposed to enjoy the movie more because someone actually died or was terrorized is somewhat frightening in and of itself.

default userpic

Although it wasn't promoted as such, the much maligned Night of the Living Dead 3-D (which I thought wasn't half bad) pulled a major plot element from a news item from seven or eight years ago. There was a story about a crematorium in Georgia that hadn't cremated a body in years but was just letting them literally pile up. In the movie, this was incorporated with the fact that they were supposedly disposing of some kind of medical waste from an experimental government lab, all of which combined to reanimate the dead.

default userpic

How about "The Town That Dreaded Sundown", the movie that starred Ben Johnson and Dawn Wells. That one also claimed to be based on a real event. Although they did take liberties on the story. The real Texas Ranger guy was hispanic.

user-pic

I don't know that knowing a movie is based on "true events" makes it any more enjoyable necessarily; as Pierce and I have said, it's more about the suspension of disbelief. I'm not even sure that'd be the intention of the filmmakers themselves. I don't think horror movies, even those based on "true events," are meant to be covert snuff films.

default userpic

This is weird: "The Exorcist," one of the most famous and notorious horror flicks/novels of all time, was "inspired by true events"...but it wasn't advertised as such. Iguess that would have been just Too Creepy for audiences to deal with.

Leave a comment