Director Dan Gildark Answers Call, Explains His Cthulhu

News broke last week that Dan Gildark's Cthulhu would finally see a theatrical release on August 22. The movie has been disparaged pretty evenly by H.P. Lovecraft well-wishers and role-players (and they are legion), but most of them haven't seen it. Their grudges, however, can be reduced to three basic points:
1. The film takes place in the gloomy Pacific Northwest, not gloomy New England.
2. The title is misleading, since film is actually based on the story The Shadow Over Innsmouth and doesn't actually feature Old Squid-Face himself at all.
3. The biggest name in the cast is Tori Spelling.
I could see where the first two points are coming from. As for the third, get over it: Anyone who saw The House of Yes knows what our gal Tori can do with a meaty supporting role. Not having seen the film either, I decided to get in touch with Daniel Gildark himself and straighten everything out.
It's impossible to dance around the subject of the extreme negativity Cthulhu has inspired, so Gildark doesn't bother. "There's a lot of sidelong glances... 'Didn't this thing die on the vine? Why the hell is it coming up now?'" he says, mimicking reactions to news of the release. "After a while, a lot of people had sort of let it go, but now that the film's finally coming out, it's just stirring the pot again." (One thing these naysayers ought to consider: The version debuting in August is a significantly different cut of the film than the one screened at festivals, and shorter by about 15 minutes.)
Gildark strongly feels that the mythos is universal, and thus updating the story's setting poses no threat to the author's original intent. "My screenwriter, Grant Cogswell, had been reading Lovecraft as he traveled cross-country, and seeing the desolation of strip malls and highways everywhere really resonated with him. Because the stories are really a radical metaphor for where we are now," he says, "the idea of these powers beyond our perception, that we have no control over, trying to destroy the world."
"The story that really stood out to me was The Shadow Over Innsmouth," Gildark recalls. "It had parallels to all these friends of ours who were gay, or were artists, who had grown up in small-town America but moved to the city to find themselves -- which, in our case, was Seattle. Later in life, though, you get pulled back; when there is a death in the family for example. And as you know, a big theme for Lovecraft was the inevitable horror of heredity, not being able to escape who you are. So though I came to Lovecraft late, it really struck a chord with me thanks to that combination of the world's situation and the personal connection to the people we knew."
So what about the title? "We knew we'd get beef from the fanbase early on when we decided to stick with that title," he admits, "If you take a step back though, and look at the pantheon of Lovecraft's work and the mythos he created, then it's more than just a creature or a being -- for me the word Cthulhu really embodies all those forces that operate outside our perception, the whole idea that we have no control over our universe. I really wanted to stick with it because of what that word represents in a larger sense. It gets to the heart of what the movie is." Gildark accepts his haters, but doesn't feel they speak for all Lovecraftians. "The fanbase that's more into the RPG side of things is really apprehensive about the film," he comments. "But then the best responses also come from the true base, and people who've actually seen it. We went to the H.P. Lovecraft film festival in 2007 and won an award."
There's still plenty of time for purists to continue to dog the film, but Gildark and Cogswell's vision may be a valuable contribution to the mythos we all know and love (and secretly dread). Considering the dearth of interesting Lovecraft adaptations out there (remember, he's often referred to as "unfilmable"), isn't there room at the table for a movie that's interesting because it's a departure from the source material, not in spite of that fact? And doesn't Tori Spelling have more friends that can vote on IMDB and improve the film's ranking? Look for the answers to all these questions later this summer when Cthulhu finally rises.




















Don't forget, those of you who saw The Happening this weekend-- no matter what you thought of the movie as a whole, if you have any comments on Betty Buckley's super-crazy performance, be sure to leave them for her right here.
I'm intrigued. Innsmouth has always been a favorite of mine, and of many HPL fans, I think, although it was pretty thoroughly covered in DAGON. I agree that "Cthulhu" sums up HPL's vision pretty well, so the director seems to get it. But what HPL fans *really* wanna see is not something that is "departure from the source material"--because let's face it, that's all we've ever gotten--but something that hews pretty closely to the original stories. I guess until Del Toro's "At the Mountains of Madness" adaptation comes along, this will do.