Monsterfest

Horror Movies, News, Discussion

Should You Add Cloverfield to Your DVD Collection?

cloverfield560.jpg

Novelist Scott Sigler's horror column appears every Thursday.

I'm a big fan of monster movies, and I'm a big fan of DVDs with tons of extra goodies you didn't get to see in the theaters. So, you would think that the DVD for the monster movie Cloverfield, which came out April 22, would be a must-buy for my collection... Not so fast.

At this point in his career, producer J.J. Abrams has the keys to the city (that city being Hollywood). You know the name: He's the producer of huge TV hits like Lost, Alias and Felicity, director of MI:3 and soon, Star Trek (2009) and The Invisible Woman (2010). The man can do just about anything he wants. So when the guy who blatantly ripped off the USA Network series La Femme Nikita with Alias, and who made the chick-flick schlock known as Felicity wanted to make a giant monster movie, Hollywood royalty may have scratched their heads in confusion, but they sure as hell gave it the green light.

That green light paid off, to the tune of $80 million at the box office and a sequel slated for a 2009 release. Now keep in mind, that $55 million in profit is before the DVD moolah, which should be significant. Yep, we're back on the subject of the DVD, so let's break that baby down.

Is Cloverfield Worth the Rental?
• If you've haven't seen this movie, absolutely rent it. King Kong (2005) and the excellent Korean flick The Host (2006) have brought the creature feature back to the big screen, and Cloverfield keeps the ball rolling.
• If you've already seen Cloverfield in the theaters, and are a huge fan of "how they did that" special effects segments, the DVD is pure gold.
• If you've already seen Cloverfield, and you don't really care about FX geekery, skip it. On the small screen it's really not worth a second take, and the non-FX special features of this DVD are pure crap. Did I say "pure crap?" Well, that might not be completely true, they are 90 percent crap cut with 10 percent secretions from marketing scumbags. While I call 'em like I see 'em, I'll also back this statement up with a list of the special features in the Cloverfield DVD.

"Alternate" Endings
Yeah, I put this in quotes, but only because you can't see me make air quotes when I say it. You know, air quotes, that thing you do with your fingers to convey sarcasm? There are no alternate endings. The DVD makers have the gall to market two "alternate" endings, when both endings just take the theatrical version and end it before the final monster scene. That's right, it's the same thing you saw in theaters. This is like taking a 350-page novel, ripping out the last 10 pages, then putting a new cover on it and selling it as an "alternate" ending.

Deleted Scenes
Cloverfield is a monster movie... I don't know about you, but I assumed the deleted scenes would have something to do with the monster. Wrong-Oh, Fish Breath. It's four worthless vignettes from the party that opens the movie, people telling Rob to have a grand-ol' time in Japan. There isn't a single shred of entertainment to be had in these scenes. A total waste, and more B.S. marketing.

Creature Design (Listed as "I Saw It! It's Alive! It's Huge!")
This segment is both cool and dumb at the same time. Anytime you see behind the curtain of creature design, it's pretty sweet, and this is no exception. You definitely get the hint that there will be more Cloverfield movies, and they won't just be a re-hashing of city destruction. There's a lot more to the story of this monster than stomping buildings and eating people. I say this, because a lot of the things that creature designer Neville Page and director Matt Reeves say leave you mumbling, "What are they talking about?" The creature is apparently "a baby." That's right, 30 stories tall, and it's a baby. The moviemakers also seem to think it's obvious the monster is a wild animal with no intelligence. A wild, scared animal that, apparently, has a "frightened expression" and wants its mommy. Yeah, me too, didn't get a lick of that from watching it in theaters. Again, this is probably part of the larger story (and when I say "larger," if Clover is a baby, we can only imagine the size of its mom).

Outakes (Listed as "Clover Fun")
Another completely worthless segment. Nothing funny, nothing interesting, just skip it.

Cloverfield Visual Effects
This is where the DVD really shines. This short documentary on how they did the effects for Cloverfield is absolutely stunning. What blows you away isn't necessarily the monster effects, which were great, what gets you is when you see just how much of what you saw was computer generated: Buildings, debris, vehicles ... just about everything that wasn't a person. The amount of work that went into this movie makes the Pyramids look like a Cub Scout merit badge project. 

This technology is also downright scary -- when you see how they made the movie look so real, it's easy to envision a time maybe only five to ten years away when revisionist historians use it to make their own versions of the world's events. Combine that tech with unstoppable distribution of YouTube and other Internet sources, and you're going to wind up with millions of people who embrace a completely different history because "they saw it for themselves." When you can't tell the difference between genuine archival footage and footage made for political or religious positioning, it will be the start of frightening time.

The Making of Cloverfield
Like the visual effects segment, this is good. The only problem is that they use a ton of the same footage they used in the visual effects piece. So as you're watching this, even when it's interesting, you're annoyed because you already saw these talking heads saying the exact same thing. It's as if two different teams made each segment, drawing from a common pile of footage.

Parasites
One awesome thing you learn from the DVD is that the little, dog-sized monsters that scurry through the city are not baby Cloverfields. The movie makers call these things "parasites." The DVD footage gives you really clear shots of the critter, something you did not get in the theatrical version. The parasites apparently cling to the monster, and when the monster hits New York, some of the parasites either fall off or jump off. Now this is what you buy a DVD for, to get that inside info that you missed in the theaters. 

Put a Screwdriver Through My Ears, Please
If I have to hear "How does a gigantic 350-foot monster move through the street of Manhattan?" one more time, I'll rush the stage at an Ozzy concert and push my ears up against the biggest speaker I can find just to make myself go deaf. Yeah, the DVD special features use this line a lot.

Roll Credits...
If you like watching monsters trash cities over and over again, Cloverfield is okay. The movie offers a unique, first-person view of what it's like to be one of the ants scurrying about as the monster wreaks havoc. While that makes for an original concept, it's not so great for re-watchability -- you just don't get clear shots of the monster doing its thing. Once you've seen the "bomb run" scene and you know what Clover looks like, there isn't a whole lot to hold you for repeat views. So in a nutshell, you geek out over FX secrets? Rent it. You don't roll like that? Skip it.

scott75.jpgScott Sigler writes tales of hard-science horror, then gives them away as free audiobooks at www.scottsigler.com. Infected, hit stores on April 1, 2008. If you don't agree with what Scott says in this blog, please email him scott@scottsigler.com. Please include all relevant personal information, such as your address and what times you are not home, in case Scott wishes to send someone to "discuss" your opinions.

  • Comments (4)
  • (5)
  • Email this entry
  • Link

Filed under: Scott Sigler
Tags: cloverfield

Comments

default userpic

Cloverfield SUCKED! Most of it was just boring. The best parts of it were the monster scenes, and I just had to laugh at those. They were ridiculous! I think I might have been desensitized a little by FDO™.

user-pic

Cloverfield was merely OK. The video gimmick actually reduced its entertainment value. Giant monster terrorizing NYC and the ensuing panic? Yes. Smug, anonymous, trust fund, vaguely hipster assholes running around like idiots? No. And I don't like having to watch DVD extras to figure out what's going on in a movie; the movie itself should suffice.

user-pic

Owen: The monster scenes did leave a bit to be desired. I'm hoping the sequel(s) will create a larger story arc that will explain some things (like how a freaking direct hit delivered from bombers failed to pop the fleshy little lung-bags from the sides of Clover's head ...).

Will.E.: Please, do not offend my many smug, anonymous, trust fund, vaguely hipster asshole fans. Well, they would be fans if they weren't so busy trying to be bored by it all ...

default userpic

Personally, I loved Cloverfield. I found it to be a unique and fresh twist on the genre.

I call it a pretty good movie when find myself actually leaning in my seat trying to peak around a corner to catch a glimpse of "what the HELL was that!"

I do admit that the the Blair Witchiness of the movie was a tad annoying (by the way, when I saw BW in the theater, I got there late and sat in the third row - my subsequent headache and nausea lasted for days.)

I saw in the theater and bought the DVD. I got deal at $15 a Circuit City. It's well worth that as it has been viewed at least 4 times in my house.

I agree that the extras were not that great. However, if you bought your version at Best Buy, you got a bonus DVD. (Not sure what's on that.)

My 11 year old son, who fancies himself a future filmmaker, is already planning out the sequel to "Cheese 2."

We're happy with decision.

Leave a comment