Horror Hacker

Horror Movies, News, Discussion

Halloween II Review - Is Rob Zombie Twice as Scary This Time Around?

halloween-new-560.jpg

Less a remake than a wholesale re-imagining of the original Halloween II, directed by Rick Rosenthal and written by John Carpenter and Debra Hill, Rob Zombie's sequel to his reboot is driven by the kind of questions that plague every doom-haunted horror buff. It may be fun to groove on the kick-ass pluck of uber-final girls like Jamie Lee Curtis' Laurie Strode, but when you really think about it, it's hard to imagine Laurie -- or The Texas Chain Saw Massacre's Sally Hardesty or Scream's Sidney Barrows -- ever forging a normal life from the bloody shreds left after her ordeal with a psychopath.

October 31: Laurie Strode (Scout Taylor-Compton) walks down a deserted Haddonfield street, covered with blood and on her way into deep shock. She's intercepted by sympathetic Sheriff Brackett (Brad Dourif), who takes her to the same hospital where doctors are feverishly trying to save his own daughter, Annie (Danielle Harris). Back at the crime scene, Dr. Loomis (Malcolm McDowell) is loaded into another ambulance, while the body of Michael Myers (Tyler Mane) is bagged and dispatched to the coroner's office. And then everything goes horribly wrong: There's a gruesome accident, Michael's body vanishes, and Laurie, hobbled by an arm cast and a leg brace, is running again. Or is that hobbling? But wait -- it's all just a dream!

When Laurie wakes up, it's almost a year later -- October 29, to be precise -- and she's living with Sheriff Brackett and Annie. Laurie is trying to move forward, but despite the best efforts of her therapist (Margot Kidder), she's borne back ceaselessly into the past by vivid nightmares and the knowledge that Michael's body vanished and was never found. Laurie is hanging onto normal life by a thin thread that begins to fray when Dr. Loomis comes to town hawking his new book, The Devil Walks Among Us, which proclaims that Laurie is really Angel Myers, Michael's other sister. Blood is thicker than water; Michael is on his way home.

The dream sequence that would be a cheap "Boo" is most contexts, here pays tribute to the original Halloween II, then allows Zombie to move on to what really interests him: Laurie Strode's heroic efforts to remake herself in the shadow of unimaginable horror, in a Haddonfield suspended somewhere in and out of time. There's a flat-screen TV in Loomis' hotel room, but The Moody Blues and silent-era cartoons flicker across Laurie's tiny B&W set; the cars are a mix of new and old, but home phones are all clunky old dial units and no-one has a mobile phone. Even the characters' clothes are carefully calibrated to evoke both past and present, from the Rocky Horror Picture Show gear Laurie and her new best friends Mya (Brea Grant) and Harley (Angela Trimbur) don for Halloween to the goofy knit caps and bell-bottoms that could be retro-chic or just podunk-town uncool.

Halloween II is bound to be polarizing: If you like your Michael Myers a cipher, purely and simply evil, odds are you'll hate the lengthy hallucinatory sequences that unite the grown Michael, his mother (Sherri Moon Zombie) -- now a belle dame sans merci in diaphanous white -- and his younger self (Chase Vanek) in a never-never land of glittering snow and pumpkin-headed grotesques. But Zombie's gorgeous B&W fantasy sequences -- which owe their gothic glory to '60s horror all'italia -- are the perfect counterpoint to the movie's all-too-real evocation of crass, cynical, real-world exploitation, embodied in everything from Loomis' book to the facade of seedy strip-club The Rabbit in Red, which now boasts that Michael Myers' mom once bared her boobs there.

Every generation gets the monsters it deserves, and Rob Zombie's Michael Myers is a true demon of the 21st century. How do you think it stacks up against its predecessors? Tell us now!

rank-movies-btn.gif



To read the AMC Filmcritic review of Halloween II, click here.

  • Comments (2)
  • (0)
  • Link
  • Add This!

Filed under: Maitland McDonagh, Movie Reviews
Tags: halloween ii

Comments

user-pic

Unexpectedly, I'm LOVING it. And yours is a really admirable evaluation.

default userpic

Seeing this film showed me the devotion of Zombie’s capabilities to direct horror films. But it also revealed his lack to edit. Im not sure if he had all the power in the edit room, however you can see where he was trying to take this film, but failed. Curtain scenes in this film were too long and uncalled for. Other scenes where beautifully done and reimage Halloween in a way I would have never dreamed of. His goal at the start was to make Michael Myers scary again . . . and bravo, he did just that.
The only scenes I really had a problem with, was too much of “ghostly mom.” Fine! He wanted his wife in the sequel but too much of Little Mikey and Mom in the film took away from the horror... Wait!!!! In the first film Little Michael didn’t talk to his mom either tours the end and even lashed out at her, before she shoots herself, why all of a sudden he’s talking to her ghost, makes no sense?
We all heard in these films what Michael Myers had to do to survive but never really had a director visually take you to that place. Zombie had no problems allowing you to see a glimpse of the man eating his meal. Which personally disgust me, I don’t know if that’s a “well done” scene or a badly decision, again. But all I have to say is, “that was sick!”
But there were a couple of things I love which was: Laurie Strode’s dream sequences and the bloody death carnage of Annie. At first, it was just another fatality, but shortly becomes a sadden departure of an actress we grown to love for years, died in a film series she helped built. . . Well done! (Actually, a sad scene)
Overall, this film is a have to see to judge for yourself. This is a movie like no other and an original of Zombie’s style of film making. IF you hate or love it, there are moments in the film worth mentioning. And I hope Zombie does come back to fix his mistake to a complete trilogy . . . because the ending needs a better conclusion than where he left the film. . .Broken and unfinished.

Leave a comment